Why People Criticize What They Don’t Understand
Every few days, I come across the same scene in different forms. Someone rejects a new idea, laughs at a concept, or dismisses a person’s effort without understanding even half the story. It happens in meetings, classrooms, WhatsApp groups, and of course on the loud, restless streets of social media.
The pattern is old, predictable, and strangely human. “जिसे समझ ना आए, उसे बुरा कह दो” — a quiet rule many follow without admitting it. Yet behind this behaviour lies a complex mix of psychology, insecurity, and the desire to stay comfortable.
Table of Contents
- The Need to Feel in Control
- Fear of the Unknown
- Jumping to Conclusions
- The Pull of the Crowd
- How to Break the Cycle
The Need to Feel in Control
Every unfamiliar idea carries a small amount of discomfort. When someone encounters something they don’t immediately understand, a part of the mind feels unsteady. To regain balance, the quickest shortcut is criticism.
Instead of learning something new or examining the thought more deeply, people distance themselves by dismissing it. It’s a safety mechanism. It creates an illusion of superiority without asking for any real effort. And effort, especially the intellectual kind, is something many avoid.
In environments where new concepts emerge often — whether it’s analytics, strategy, or emerging tech — this reaction becomes even more visible. The unknown feels like a challenge, and criticism becomes a shield.
Fear of the Unknown
Humans have always been cautious of what they don’t understand. From ancient myths to modern debates about artificial intelligence, unfamiliar territory triggers anxiety. Instead of saying “I don’t know”, which requires openness and honesty, some choose criticism as camouflage.
This behaviour is especially common around complex subjects. Data, science, algorithms, behavioural theories — many people hesitate to admit gaps in their understanding. “अधूरा ज्ञान सबसे खतरनाक”, yet it is often the loudest voice in the room.
Jumping to Conclusions
In a fast-paced world, snap judgments have become normal. One headline, one screenshot, one half-baked tweet, and opinions are formed instantly. Social media rewards quick reactions, not slow thinking. Nuance gets lost in speed.
With only a fragment of information, people build entire theories. And because the mind loves certainty, even flawed certainty feels better than doubt. Criticism, once again, becomes a convenient shortcut.
If someone took even a minute to ask the right question, half the noise would disappear.
The Pull of the Crowd
Human beings are social creatures. When a group holds a strong opinion, individuals often echo it without examination. This is groupthink. No deep reasoning, no independent evaluation — just the desire to belong.
Sometimes the criticism is less about the idea and more about fitting in. The crowd’s voice becomes the personal voice. “भीड़ के साथ चलना आसान है।” Standing apart requires awareness, clarity, and a willingness to think independently.
How to Break the Cycle
The solution is simple but rare: humility. There is strength in admitting that we don’t know everything. Conversations become richer the moment we replace judgment with curiosity. Asking a question often opens more doors than delivering a quick opinion.
The world already has enough instant critics. What it needs more of are people who observe patiently, think deeply, and understand first. Whether in workplaces, learning spaces, or everyday discussions, this mindset transforms the quality of dialogue.
Whenever someone rushes to criticize, it often reveals more about their insecurity than the idea being judged. Slowing down and seeking clarity is where true confidence begins.
In times when opinions travel faster than facts, choosing understanding over noise becomes a rare advantage — one that shapes better communication, better work, and better decisions.
Comments
Post a Comment